Zionism's Holocaust

The Zionist's Holocaust is nearing a holocaust, for truth will be its final
revelation.
There is no denying there was a holocaust, however, it was not Hitler alone
who was responsible. The historical facts will eventually prove that Zionistic
leaders were terribly involved, and knowingly responsible for the deaths of
millions of Jews. They had the means of sparing their own, but wanted them to
die so as to provide a world wide conscience provoking base upon which to demand
their own homeland. Can this be proven? I think not. These links are placed here to give this issue a hearing.
You make up your own mind, but only after considering the evidence, please.
Note, you need to use the discernment that is common in only the best of
investigators, so be careful.
Please be aware - there is bigotry and/or undue prejudice projected on both
sides of this issue. The facts cannot be proven through this material, but there
is more then enough common sense projected to get you to think and possibly
temper your approach to this issue. (To
a Peace Key Summation, "Eschatology
Of The Zionist's, Hitler, Or Jesus?" )

Before perusing the main body of links below consider these pages:
Ten questions to the
Zionists
Zionism:
A Dead-End in the Fight against Anti-Semitism
Contradiction,
Collusion and Controversy (Zionists took several weird
avenues to get their state, look who their first leader was, and where he came
from.)
Do not forget - Extremism is not just limited to one side of this
situation.
Winning
Arguments by Landslides Farber
I should mention this: There are more holocaust movies being produced. (By
Zionists)

Nizkor Project The end of
WWII view Many articles in support of the history of the extermination, via
Gas, of six million Jews, but ..... Was it really six million?
In early 1988, American execution hardware expert Fred A.
Leuchter, Jr., carried out the first-ever forensic investigation of the alleged
extermination gas chambers at Auschwitz,
Birkenau and Majdanek.
Holocaust Hucksters, with their obstinate promotion of this
outlandish propaganda claim that there were homicidal gassings in places like
Auschwitz who are under strict obligation to produce the evidence in support of
their fantastic yarns.


This is like gathering evidence
after an accident that was witnessed by numbers of people, who all gave
different versions of what happened.
Note: still there were areas of
agreement. Look for that in all of these views. Where, or on what do they do
they agree? Here is a start: They all believe there was a holocaust. (Surprised?)

Provided in support of the Revisionists, who take note of the
discrepancies found in those who attack Leuchter Jr.
Jews were overwhelmingly represented in Germany in Communist
subversion during the Weimar period.
On March 24th, 1933, international Jewry declared
war on Germany and ordered a world-wide boycott of German goods simply because
the German government had removed Jews from influential positions and
transferred power back to the German people. The boycott order and the Jewish
war against Germany were reported in the world print and broadcast media of the
time. False stories of German "death camps" were in fact circulated
even before the outbreak of World War Two.
The principal concessions made by P relate to: the
Einsatzgruppen shootings of Jews in the East and deportations; the use of gas
vans at Chelmno and in Yugoslavia; the "Action Reinhard" Camps;
Auschwitz and Auschwitz-Birkenau; the Leuchter Report.

More Believers In The Full Story of the Holocaust
In a court of law, it is difficult to find more convincing proof than a
confession, and the confession of SS officer Josef Kramer — who was in charge
of the gas chambers and crematoria at Auschwitz-Birkenau is particularly
compelling.
On these parades Grese herself chose the people to be killed in
this way. In one selection about August, 1944, there were between 2000 and 3000
selected. At this selection Grese and Mengele were responsible for selecting
those for the gas chamber.
Will you explain to the Court how it is that, in the first
statement you made, you said the allegations referring to gas chambers, mass
executions, whipping and cruelty were untrue?
In
contrast:
I prize the Kremer case very much. It shows how fragile are the proofs that
people offer to us, to what extent they allow themselves to be easily deceived
by appearances, how much the official historians have misused the texts and how
it is necessary to work if you wish, in the study of texts, to distinguish
between the true and the false, between the real meaning and the
misinterpretation.
Which
was it?

There is
more to the story:


Back to -